Skip to content

Understand the numbers

What does this figure look like in practice?

Compare the scale of reported financial irregularities with familiar public programmes and infrastructure. These are illustrations—not a claim that every reported irregularity was cash lost or available to spend.

Live archive total · USD

$19,962,526,848

This nominal total is calculated from all available extracted reports in the archive. It will update as the underlying database changes.

Schools · 2020

Six-unit basic-school classroom block

A six-classroom block at Esuoso with a computer room, toilets, urinal and landscaping.

Converted at the archive's 2020 rate of GH₵5.7602 per US dollar. Location, specification and construction inflation materially change school costs.

Illustrative equivalent

209,069 times the Six-unit basic-school classroom block benchmarktimes

$19.96B ÷ $95.48K

Schools · 2020

Ghana Accountability for Learning Outcomes Project

A nationwide programme supporting teaching and learning in low-performing basic schools.

Programme commitmentUS$219mMinistry of Finance

This is programme financing for learning outcomes, not the cost of constructing a school.

Illustrative equivalent

91.3 times the Ghana Accountability for Learning Outcomes Project benchmarktimes

$19.96B ÷ $218.7M

Methodology

A scale comparison, not a spending claim.

Each equivalent divides the live US-dollar archive total by one published benchmark cost. Cedi benchmarks are converted using the documented rate for the benchmark’s source year—not today’s exchange rate.

Audit irregularities include several kinds of control failure and do not all represent confirmed theft or an immediately recoverable cash loss. Programme allocations, financing commitments, and reported project costs are also different kinds of figures; every row labels which one it uses.

Whole-build language is rounded down only when a whole number is shown. The calculation displayed under each result uses the unrounded values. Read the linked source and its caveat before citing a comparison.

Read the archive methodology · Inspect the underlying figures